You’re bloody kidding me?” I whispered to Marina.
Marina did not reply. Gobsmacked and aware of the encroaching madness, her grip tightened around mine. I scanned the room; everyone was transfixed by the person on stage, their grins overflowing with appreciation.
Marina and I were attending the NSW Writers centre Christmas party to witness the announcement of the winners of the “Inner City Life” and Open Book” Prize. I had entered “Between Borders and Buses” in the latter competition with quiet optimism. Admittedly, I describe my first attempt at a novel as “throwaway fiction,” because it is the type of book a person might pick up in a airport bookstore or sale bin, have thorough read and then (a) leave it on their bookshelf to collect dust (because it is thick like the author) or (b) swap it for something better. Still, I consider it to be entertaining, enlightening, and easy to read.
I thought that these three facets (and feel free to call me naïve) along with the standard rules of English, such as grammar and style, would be high on the judging criteria and would at least get me shortlisted.
Obviously not.
Upon hearing the quality of the stories that won the short story component of the “Inner City Life” prize, I knew “Between Borders and Buses” with its simple everyday English and cynical humour did not stand a chance.
Hindsight tells me I should not have been surprised at this. Marina and I arrived at the NSW Writers centre expecting a raucous party were writers, imbued with festive spirit, threw punctuation to the wind and enjoyed illicit conjunctions amongst the dusty bookshelves. We were greeted instead by what could best be described as a polite, somewhat snooty, literary soiree.
The organisers though, were eager to get the creative juices flowing by plying everyone with a glass of wine upon arrival.
One middle aged man in particular took full advantage of what was on offer and tried to get the party started with as many ladies as possible, including the small group Marina and I were chatting too.
Barging into our conversation he proclaimed: “Ladies, don’t you think my tie is pretty spiffy?”
Murmurs of awkward appreciation were directed in his direction.
“Go on,” he challenged, “Pull it. It’s great. It plays a jaunty Christmas tune.”
The ladies opposite shuffled away, Marina drew closer to me.
Not letting the women’s disinterest stop him, he made an extraordinary gesture of showing us how it was done. From his prowess, he was obviously an expert at pulling his own tie.
When the horrible rendition of “Jingle Bells” subsided, he posed the question: “So what brings all of you here?”
I was the last the answer and informed him about my book.
“That’s excellent. I’m doing that now with a self help book…” he prattled.
My mind drifted off to what possible self help a man of his calibre could offer. I even came up with some working titles he might be able to use: “Pull Your Tie: For Pleasure and Profit” or “Picking the right tie to pull!” Maybe he preferred a different tact: “Make awkward silences rewarding?” or “Remove Group Dynamic Creatively and Swiftly!” and the standard, “Get Noticed: Be Obnoxious for Dummies.”
His ramblings were silenced by the master of ceremonies, who expertly quelled the haughty conversation with a few choice words.
The first awards of the evening were handed out to the winners of the “Inner City Life” poetry prize. These were followed by the short story winners based on the same theme.
Before I unsheathe my claws, you fetch me a saucer of milk and call me a catty bastich, let me clarify that I am not bemoaning about the writers that wrote the winning stories or even the subject matter, but the use, or lack thereof, of grammar, style and prose that made me question how the stories won the prizes that they did.
When I heard the winning entries I was reminded of my editor, Stephen King’s Book “On Writing: A Memoir” and what many agree, including Mr. King, is a must have for every aspiring and already successful writer, Strunk and White’s “The Elements of Style.”
All three agree writing in the “active voice” is better than the “passive voice” because produces succinct, direct sentences. Yes, I am quite aware that I occasionally write in the passive voice, but it is a bad habit and I am making a conscious effort to change.
Obviously this simple caveat was not in the award winners editing toolbox. Neither were the general rules of what constitutes a short story.
When I was enrolled in my writing course, the structure of a short story was hammered home, time and time again. A short story had to have an introduction, a body and a conclusion, which typically involves a twist.
The problem with the stories that won is that they had none of these, and simply seemed to be exercises in illustrating how well the author could write flouncy, flowery sentences.
Here, let me show you some snippets of Wisdom Lane, the story that took the third prize. It starts off:
Wisdom Lane runs between old paling fences and a wire security fence. The paling fences are crooked, bent by age and trees. They hide gardens and back doors and families. The security fence has huge gaps and hides nothing. It has bits of clothing and underwear stuck in it; torn stockings tied up like indulgences – please god, Buddha, Allah, who ha: help me, save me, give me, take me away.
This is good example of passive voice. One possible way to write it in the active voice would be:
“The paling fences that line Wisdom Lane are crooked, ravaged by age and nature; holding suburbia at bay. The security fence runs opposite; holding back nothing, it is lavished with haggard articles of tattered clothing like indulgences to forgotten deities.”
Passive voice notwithstanding, a short story must have, regardless of scene, a plot that reaches up, grabs the reader by his or her cockles or boobles and sucks them into the story. No such luck in Wisdom lane:
Wisdom Lane turns off my lane. It’s not my lane, I just say that because it runs between the building I live in and the building where other people live. They have an outside area and a clothesline. People sit out there on warm evenings. They watch the man who goes through our bins and eats the scraps. He bothers me that man.
When I heard this paragraph my heartbeat skipped with excitement. Can you believe it? Other people live next to the lane too and they have clothesline? Wow! Just when I thought the story couldn’t get anymore thrilling, we find out that people sit out on warm evenings and watch a man going through garbage. I hear Stephen Spielberg wants to make this into a movie and cast Brad Pitt as the clothesline. True to form, the writer introduces the antagonist and nothing says “Grab your teddy and call your mama” then a man that digs through bins. Probably, like me, desperately searching for the point to this story.
My girl works this lane. She’s not my girl. I just say that because she works my lane and then takes them down that Wisdom Lane. Perhaps they squeeze through the gap in the security fence and lie on the pine needles. Perhaps she looks at the stars through the leaves and pretends she’s somewhere else. Perhaps it’s just wise to stay on the ball.
We are half way through the story and we are in the throes of ambiguity. I listened and dabbed the blood from my ears. Perhaps the narrator will agree on what is a happening. Perhaps the plot will pick up. Perhaps the story will end soon. Perhaps a light fitting will fall on my head, giving me an excuse to leave. What I would not have given for some one to pull Mr. Obnoxious’ tie. At least “Jingle Bell’s” has a story you can follow.
Just to recap, there is a person who lives next to lane that is used for prostitution. This person takes no ownership of anything and happily whittles away time by imagining what thoughts fill the head of the hooker while she is with a client. How is this special? As a reader I want to be involved with the story and its characters. The way the story is written, I feel distant, removed. I could not care less about the lane or the girl. Don’t you think you would connect with the story if it was written from the prostitute’s daughter point of view? Even end is aloof with hearsay.
Sometimes they do it in my lane, against my wall. Under my window. What a racket. Cut out the dramatics I want to yell, but I don’t. I don’t want to join in.
The story end as it starts and I want to know, where is the story’s twist? I reckon it got bored waiting for something interesting to happen and like the narrator did not want to get involved. I have to ask though, is this what Inner City life means to the writer – a disconnected, selfish viewpoint? If so, I think she needs to look at her glass from a different angle, and hopefully she will see that half empty is the same as half full.
Thankfully the second prize winner restored my faith. You can read his story (and I highly recommend you do – it’ll only take 3 minutes) at the following link:
http://www.nswwriterscentre.org.au/html/s02_article/article_view.asp?id=569&nav_cat_id=196&nav_top_id=73
Unfortunately the winning entry – “Renting James Joyce’s House” – destroyed any hope I had that the judges had any modicum of sensibility and left me feeling sorry for the author of the story that won second prize, who must have felt robbed. I know I would of. Before I sully your judgement with my prejudices I am going to insert a few choice paragraphs of the story starting with the introduction:
Foetuscrooked under his elbell Anna snoresnuggled for hours after, until waking from her heavendream, she echoed the loving lappings and longings of the night before and he stirred, thickened with sleep. Hair twined, sleep-stained, all limbs interlocking, they again rockinghorsed to the end. The sheets, sodden sails, pinned them to the deck of the bed, only the metallic borborigmi of their bellynoises forcing them to lift the deadweight and, rising, retreat into separateness for the day.
This was followed closely by paragraph 2:
Breakfast was coffee, Bewleys Oriental Café incarnate in parabola-chipped mugs – water, tumbled from the Dublin Mountains to be tinged brown with Eastern promise. Javascented waveswirls mingled with their own smells: staphylococci and coliforms battling for dominance in the shared territories. Sunlight, coloured redbrick red, entered the room through the oblong casement, carrying lifedust from the street outside. Under the door slid goldendappled pavement light, wet with the vapourised urine of dogs. A faint ammoniacal smell mingled with the almost visible wafts of coffee-steam, in combination a delicious olfactory assault, evoking melancholy thoughts of babyhood and old age, warm wee and comfort.
Past the halfway point, we find ourselves at paragraph 4
Anna thought, what a grand happyventure. That last time – it was like satin, like silk, like a new baby’s forehead. All the feelings in me swelling welling, gushing, bubbling, boiling. I was a volcano, no, a spring, a hot spring, endless, folding, and born, born over and over, newskinned, wise-eyed, pulsing, pulsing, pulsing. Exquisite, he is, with his pink, turkish-delight whatsit and the blue round his eyes and the redbrick light and the sounds and the shiningsmells, and me, with him, in this place, at the centre of this place, part of it all, going on forever and ever, amen, telling him I’ll love him forever and ever amen.
Who can forget this stimulating piece of conversation?
‘Toast?’
‘Yes yes I will Yes.’
Followed closely by the grand ending:
Lizst. Chopin. Lizst. Quod erat demonstrandum. Every good boy deserves favour. Eye always on Stephen, penciltaste in her mouth, she finally marked the virgin page. ‘Foetuscrooked under his elbell Anna snored…’
So what did you all think? I would love to see your comments.
Before I let you in my thoughts, here is Microsoft Word’s reaction to this piece of prose. You know that paper clip that you hate with a passion? Well he won’t bother you anymore. After I inserted the previous story, he took umbrage at the amount of red and green lines that were popping up and without a second’s hesitation, killed himself with a self inflicted virus.
Like “Wisdom Lane” I really would love to enlighten you all with what took place in the above story, but frankly I was more confused than Marina with a street directory. The story was weighed down with so much purple prose, you could be forgiven for thinking that Barney wrote it.
Exacerbating my suffering further, was the disconnect between the story, and I use that term loosely, and the theme of the competition “Inner City Life”. For one, I did not realise that people in the inner city had orgasms when they were offered toast. If they do, it must certainly be some damn fine bread and I really need to find that bakery.
Another aspect that had me scratching my head was that girls always tell me “that they like to have fun.” According the story though, they love “grand happyventure”, enjoy “goldendappled pavement light, wet with the vapourised urine of dogs” (and who doesn’t) or the occasional “snoresnuggle.” Can any women out there please explain me to what this is exactly?
There is even mention of “life dust.” If you ask me the author, if not the judges, was on too much of “life dust” when the story was written and judged.
In the end it did not matter because one common thread linked the 1st and 3rd prize winners. The authors seemed so intent on describing a setting, they lost sight of the story, which was the point of the whole competition to begin with.
Like I said, “Between Borders and Buses” didn’t stand a chance in the Open Book Prize. The winner of the fiction prize was a children’s book called “Blotch the Dog”. The premise certainly peaked my interest because the book is told completely from the dog’s point of view. Nonetheless I did find it somewhat strange how the prize was announced by the by one of the judges: “I am so happy that the winner of the Open Book Prize goes to this particular book. I have seen the author struggle, right from the beginning, through the editing stages and even towards the end. I am so overjoyed to be able to present this year’s Open Book Prize to ‘Blotch the Dog.’”
So where does that leave me? Grumpy? Damn straight! Well I am over 30 after all and the grumpy gene is in full effect. Annoyed? Most definitely! Disheartened? Far from it! There are always more awards, more blogs and certainly more books.
Till then I bid you a happy snoresnuggle and hope your clothes do not end life as indulgences on a random fence that may or may not be your fence in a lane that may or may not have a clothesline as you enjoy you caffeinated lifestyle tinged with the bitter sweet urine of the local man who looks through your bins.